|
Organisation:
|
Communication
from Brazil |
|
Title:
|
Response
to questions raised on the draft amendment to TRIPS. Article
29BIS
|
|
Content
/
Proposals:
|
The document is provides some clarifications
on the proposed amendment to the TRIPS to incorporate
disclosure requirements in patent applications
|
| |
Date:
|
26
July, 2006
|
Reference:
|
IP/C/W/475
|
| |
|
|
Organisation:
|
Note
by Brazil, India, Paksitan, Thailand, Peru and Tanzania |
|
Title:
|
Doha
Work Programme- The outstanding Implementation Issue on
the Relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention
on Biological Diversity
|
|
Content
/
Proposals:
|
The document is the draft text of the
proposed Amendment to the TRIPS Agreement to incorporate
disclosure requirements in patent applications
|
| |
Date:
|
5
July , 2006
|
Reference:
|
WT/GC/W/564/rev2
or TN/C/W/41 or IP/C/W/474
|
| |
|
|
Organisation:
|
Norway |
|
Title:
|
The
Relationship between the TRIPS Agreement, the Convention
on Biological Diversity and the protection of traditional
knowledge — Amending the TRIPS Agreement to Introduce
an Obligation to Disclose the Origin of Genetic Resources
and Traditional Knowledge in Patent Applications (Also
circulated as WT/GC/W/566 and TN/C/W/42)
|
|
Content
/
Proposals:
|
This communication outlines the key principles
Norway believes must be taken into account in ensuring
that the TRIPS and CBD are implemented in a mutually supportive
manner
|
| |
Date:
|
14
June 2006
|
Reference:
|
IP/C/W/473
|
| |
|
|
Organisation:
|
Japan |
|
Title:
|
The
Patent System and Genetic Resources
|
|
Content
/
Proposals:
|
Japan thinks that the work of the TRIPS
Council should take into account the relevant work being
carried out by WIPO to avoid the duplication of efforts
and,this document is an effort in that direction.
|
| |
Date:
|
13
June 2006
|
Reference:
|
IP/C/W/472
|
| |
|
|
Organisation:
|
Bolivia,
Cuba, Ecuador, India, Sri Lanka and Thailand |
|
Title:
|
Submission
in Response to the Communication from Switzerland (IP/C/W/446)
|
|
Content
/
Proposals:
|
The aim of this paper is to answer all
concerns and thereby alleviate the so-called "ambiguities"
surrounding the implementation issue.
|
| |
Date:
|
21
March 2006
|
Reference:
|
IP/C/W/470
|
| |
|
|
Organisation:
|
United
States |
|
Title:
|
Article
27.3(b), Relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and
the CBD, and the Protection of Traditional Knowledge and
Folklore
|
|
Content
/
Proposals:
|
The purpose of this paper is to continue
to facilitate discussions under agenda items pursuant
to paragraphs 12 and 19 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration.
|
| |
Date:
|
13
March 2006
|
Reference:
|
IP/C/W/469
|
| |
|
|
Organisation:
|
Note
by the Secretariat |
|
Title:
|
Protection
of Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, summary of issues
raised and points made
|
|
Content
/
Proposals:
|
The document replaces the earlier summary
note in IP/C/W/370, with respect to the protection of
traditional knowledge and folklore.
|
| |
Date:
|
9
March 2006
|
Reference:
|
IP/C/W/370/Rev.1
|
| |
|
|
Organisation:
|
Note
by the Secretariat |
|
Title:
|
Review
of the provisions of Article 27.3(b), summary of issues
raised and points made
|
|
Content
/
Proposals:
|
The present document, which replaces IP/C/W/369,
on the topic and includes the points that have been made
more specifically with respect to the review of the provisions
of Article 27.3(b) since the circulation of the original
note.
|
| |
Date:
|
9
March 2006
|
Reference:
|
IP/C/W/369/Rev.1
|
| |
|
|
Organisation:
|
Note
by the Secretariat |
|
Title:
|
The
relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention
on Biological Diversity, summary of issues raised and
points made
|
|
Content
/
Proposals:
|
The
document replaces the earlier document IP/C/W368 examining
the relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the CBD
|
| |
Date:
|
8
February 2006
|
Reference:
|
IP/C/W/368/Rev.1
|
| |
|
